Terug naar Encyclopedie

Material versus Immaterial Damage: Differences and Combination in Rotterdam

Differences between material and immaterial damage in Rotterdam personal injury claims, such as accidents on the Erasmus Bridge, with combination tips, table, and local examples.

1 min leestijd

Material versus Immaterial Damage: Differences and Combination in Rotterdam

In Rotterdam, the vibrant port city where traffic accidents on the Erasmus Bridge or A20 often lead to personal injury claims, material damage comprises measurable costs such as hospital bills at Erasmus MC and loss of income (article 6:95 BW). Immaterial damage concerns non-pecuniary loss for suffered suffering, such as pain following a collision on the Westersingel. Both are combined in claims at the Rotterdam District Court.

Key Differences

AspectMaterialImmaterial
CalculationErasmus MC invoices and payslipsEquity, Smartengeldgids and medical reports
EvidenceQuantifiable via invoicesMedical specialists and subjective testimonies
Financial ImpactDirect financial lossPsychological suffering due to Rotterdam traffic jams

Combining Claims in Rotterdam Practice

Example from a typical Rotterdam traffic accident on the Kralingse Plaslaan: €35,000 material (car repair and hospital admission) + €20,000 immaterial for trauma. Full compensation requires claiming both via a local personal injury lawyer. Tax-free, but set off against benefits from the UWV in Rotterdam-South.

Strategy: Engage a Rotterdam expert, such as specialised firms on the Coolsingel, to quantify total damage. This way, you maximise the payout taking into account local port worker pensions and traffic congestion.