Error and Deceit in Concluding a Rental Agreement in Rotterdam

Error (art. 6:228 DCC) and deceit (art. 6:229 DCC) make a rental agreement in Rotterdam voidable, as opposed to absolute nullity. Error occurs when a tenant has an incorrect impression of the property due to misleading information from the landlord, such as hidden moisture problems in a typical Rotterdam 1930s house in neighborhoods like Delfshaven or Feijenoord. Deceit includes intentional lies, for example about the functioning of the central heating boiler in an apartment along the Maas. The aggrieved tenant can claim voidance before the Rotterdam district court, with retroactive effect. Evidence is crucial: keep photos from viewings, WhatsApp conversations or witness statements from real estate agents. Example: a landlord in Rotterdam-South conceals cracks due to subsiding foundations; the tenant proves that he would otherwise not have signed. Voidance period: three years after discovery. After voidance, the tenant vacates the property and receives rent back, minus usage fee. Landlords in Rotterdam must provide accurate descriptions according to NVM or Vastgoedbelang standards, taking into account local requirements from the Rotterdam Housing Ordinance. Tenants: always document viewings in the harbor district or Kralingen in writing. For social housing from Woonbron or Vestia, the Housing Act provides extra protection against misleading. First try negotiating repairs via the Rent Tribunal in Rotterdam. The district court at Coolsingel handles rental disputes efficiently and cost-effectively. This way you restore the balance in Rotterdam rental law and prevent lengthy procedures at the Rotterdam court.